Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nick Harris's avatar

Hi Ivan. thanks for reading. The judge in the case presented her workings in the ruling, a copy of which is linked in the piece but you can find here: https://www.sportingintelligence.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Ben-Collett-ruling.pdf

And that ruling was upheld to the last dot and comma when it went to the Court of Appeal. That judgement is here: https://www.sportingintelligence.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/2009-06-17-Ben-Collett-Court-of-Appeal-Judgment-Transcript.pdf

Expand full comment
Ivan Cohen's avatar

An interesting and very well-researched article.

As an Economist (who once did a few calculations in the USA for loss of earnings) I am intrigued as to how the lump-sum compensation was arrived at: logically it *ought* to be the present value of the stream of lost future earnings, plus any premium for emotional distress etc. Of course, the difficulty in calculating PV would be the choice of discount rate.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts